ECOLOGY WITHOUT NATURE: Harman, Mullarkey, Laruelle

Friday, June 22, 2012

Harman, Mullarkey, Laruelle

This woke me up from a slight stupor of post-grading just now. I do wish I had a nice ottoman, but never mind.

I'm quite looking forward to Martin's new project on immanence, or rather against it. It's quite a non theistic strategy, on reflection, for Hagglund to have gone after transcendence and now to be after immanence. Radical immanence being the position of Laruelle.

1 comment:

Anthony Paul Smith said...: SMH.; June 23, 2012 at 2:38 PM

Post a Comment

“Outstanding.”
—Slavoj Zizek, In Defense of Lost Causes

“Dark ecology has the potential to be the punk rock or experimental pop of ecological thinking.”
—Kasino A4

“It isn’t [nature] itself that needs trashing — we’re doing a fine job of that already; it’s our way of thinking about it that needs to be structurally realigned ... it's an important book that, in a scant 205 pages of main text ... frames a debate that no doubt will be carried on for years to come.”
—Vince Carducci, Pop Matters

“He practices what he theorizes: nothing is wasted in his argumentation.”
—Emmanouil Aretoulakis, Synthesis

“Picking up where his most obvious predecessors, Gregory Bateson and Felix Guattari, left off, Morton understands mental ecology as the ground zero of ecological thinking, as that which must be redressed before anything else and above all. Morton goes beyond both his forebears, however, in repairing the rift between science and the humanities, which the Enlightenment opened up and against which Romanticism reacted. Perhaps most pleasantly surprising, given its erudition, is that in its stylistic elegance The Ecological Thought is as satisfying to read as it is necessary to ponder.”
—Vince Carducci

ECOLOGY WITHOUT NATURE

Pages

Friday, June 22, 2012

Harman, Mullarkey, Laruelle

1 comment:

Counter

ShareThis

Links without Nature

Artifacts without Nature